LISSIM 6
June 1-15, 2012@ Kangra
Selected Essays
Comparative Correlatives in Hindi
Deepak Kumar
PhD (DU)The goal of this essay is to give an analysis of Comparative Correlatives in Hindi. Comparative Correlatives, also called as Comparative Conditional is exemplified below. The first example is from English and the second example is from Hindi.
(1) The higher the stakes (are), the lower his expectations (are).
(2) |
[IP[CP jitnaa |
khaoge] |
[IP utne |
mote |
hote |
jaoge]] |
|
how much |
eat |
that much |
fat |
become |
go |
|
The more you eat, the fatter you become. |
den Dikken (2005) calls it unfortunate fact that the above examples do not look like (cor)relative construction at the first sight. Jespersen’s (1961) observation indicate that it is indeed a descendant of a correlative construction. den Dikken (2005) establishes that the comparative correlative construction fits the macrostructure of a correlative in Hindi perfectly as it features a relative clause in the sentence initial position followed by a clause introduced by a demonstrative as exemplified in (3) and (4).
(3) |
[IP[CP jitnaa |
suraj |
camkaa] |
[IP utni |
ThanD |
baRhi]] |
|
how much |
sun |
shine Pfv |
that much |
cold |
increase |
|
The more the sun shone, the colder it got. |
(4) |
[IP[CP jitnaa |
baRaa |
lokatantra] |
[IP utnaa |
jyaadaa |
bhrastaacaar |
|
how much |
big |
democracy |
that much |
more |
corruption |
|
The bigger the democracy, higher the corruption. |
Correlatives in Hindi too have the same construction as given below.
(7) [IP [Cor CP Rel-XP ] [IP Dem-XP ]]
Thus, crosslinguistically, the comparative correlative wears its correlative nature on its sleeve i.e., the morphosyntax of a correlative construction.
Differences between Comparative Correlative and the Correlative in Hindi
(8) |
jo |
laRkii |
khaRii |
hai |
vo laRkii |
lambii |
hai |
|
REL |
girl |
stand |
is |
DEM girl |
tall |
is |
|
The girl who is standing is tall. |
(9) |
[IP[CP jitnaa |
suraj |
camkaa] |
[IP utni |
ThanD |
baRhi]] |
|
how much |
sun |
shine Pfv |
that much |
cold |
increase |
|
The more the sun shone, the colder it got. |
(10) |
[[jo CD]i |
sale-par |
hai]i |
Maya |
[*(us) |
(CD) ko]i |
kharid-egi: |
|
Rel CD |
sale-on |
be Prs |
Maya F |
Dem |
CD Acc |
buy Fut F |
|
Maya will buy the CD that is on sale. |
(11) |
jyaadaa |
khaogi |
moti |
ho |
jaogi |
|
more |
eat |
fat |
become |
go |
|
The more you eat, the fatter you become. |
(12) |
jis |
laRkiiNEi |
jis |
laRkeKOj |
dekhaa |
usNEi |
usKOj |
pasand |
kiyaa |
|
REL |
girl-Erg |
REL |
boy-Acc |
saw |
DEM-Erg |
DEM |
liked |
|
|
Which girl saw which boy, she liked him. |
(13) |
jitni |
der |
hoti |
gayi |
utni |
becaini |
baRhti |
gayi |
|
how much |
late |
be |
go |
that much |
anxious |
increase |
go |
|
The later it got, the anxious it became. |
Structure proposed for Comparative Correlative
den Dikken (2005) proposes the following structure for the comparative correlative:
i) [HeadCl [SubCl [DegP ([PP P) [QP Op [Q]](]) [Deg’ Deg [AP comparative ]]]j… tj… ]]
ii) [HeadCl [DegP ([PP P) [QP Dem [Q]](]) [Deg’ Deg [AP comparative ]]]j… tj… ]]
The relative clause is the sub clause (SUBCL) which is adjoined to the second clause (HEADCL). Let’s see the feasibility of the proposed structure for the comparative correlative in Hindi.
(14) |
[IP[CP jitnaa |
suraj |
camkaa] |
[IP utni |
ThanD |
baRhi]] |
|
how much |
sun |
shine Pfv |
that much |
cold |
increase |
|
The more the sun shone, the colder it got. |
In sub clause, DegP is the degree phrase (as in the English example the higher the stakes… ). In the second clause Deg head appears. So, it looks most unlikely that the structure proposed is feasible for comparative correlatives in Hindi. As den Dikken (2005) points out that comparative correlative fits the macrostructure of a correlative, so it is most likely to have that structure i.e., of the correlative.
(15)
IP
Thus, comparative
correlatives are different from correlatives in Hindi but structurally looks
the same.
3
Rel Cl
IP
jitnaa suraj camkaa3
3
Dem-XP
V
utni ThanD baRhi
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2003. Locality in Correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 210:485-541.
Srivastav, Veneeta. 1991. The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 9: 637-686.
Siloni, Tal. 1995. On Participial Relatives and Complementizer D0: a Case study
in Hebrew and French. Natural language and Linguistic Theory. 13: 445-487.Den Dikken, Marcel. 2005. Comparative Correlatives Comparatively. Linguistic Inquiry. 36:4. 497-532.
For enquiries, write to
secretary@fosssil.in
Skype Interview | |
Interview List | |
Latest News | |
LISSIM 6 Page | |
Home |